7 Best Lightweight Running Shoes in 2024

Jovana Subic
Jovana Subic on
7 Best Lightweight Running Shoes in 2024

With lightweight running shoes, you want to feel like you’re not wearing any shoes but still get the needed protection and support. Be it a daily workhorse, a racing flat, or a minimalist trainer, we gathered the best to help you achieve your personal bests.

We have tested these running shoes on many test runs and across 20+ parameters in our lab, so we know what makes a truly outstanding option.

Since the meaning of ‘lightweight’ varies depending on the category (a light daily trainer could mean a heavy race shoe), we have selected our top picks in different categories.

How we test running shoes

Any shoe that’s available on the market and weighs less than 250 grams (8.8 oz) in a men’s US size 9 makes it to our selection of light running shoes. Numbering 100+ models from 30 brands, including Nike, ASICS, Adidas, and more, we take each shoe through a thorough serious testing process:

  • We buy running shoes with our own funds to prevent bias.
  • We take each shoe on a series of runs with a total distance of 30-50 miles to provide in-depth feedback on its performance.
  • We use our RunRepeat lab to measure 30+ data points and evaluate each shoe’s cushioning, flexibility, breathability, and more. We even chop up the shoes.

Best lightweight running shoes overall

Hoka Mach 6
88
Great!

What makes it the best?

A jack-of-all-trades, the Hoka Mach 6 excels at any pace and distance with its otherworldly comfort and high level of agility for effortless miles. With its light and loose build, plus a grippy outsole, it’s a clear favorite in our lab and ranks as the top lightweight running shoe.

At just 8.2 oz (232g), the Mach 6 effortlessly covers miles, feeling virtually weightless on foot. Its lightweight construction, far below the 9.4 oz (265g) average for road running shoes, ensures it never holds us back during runs.

Beyond the lab, Mach 6 thrives on the road with its rocker design paving the way for smooth forward transitions and easing out our hard efforts with its vibrant soul. Each landing feels supported by a generous stack, which our caliper shows is 36.0/26.4 mm, followed by an energetic toe-off.

The Hoka Mach 6 isn't just about speed; it's also built for endurance. Its balanced 20.4 HA midsole offers unparalleled comfort, enveloping our feet with every stride. Furthermore, its exceptional flexibility allows it to bend with our foot's natural flexion effortlessly, evidenced by a 36.4% lower resistance compared to the average.

However, its focus on reducing weight led to a slightly narrow build. We recommend those with wide feet to explore other more accommodating options.

Pros

  • Really lightweight
  • Fantastic outsole
  • Exciting ride
  • Highly cushioned
  • Great for heel strikers
  • Handles faster paces
  • Superb lockdown
  • Excellent value at $140

Cons

  • Drop varies from stated
  • Somewhat narrow fit
  • Thin tongue
Full review of Hoka Mach 6

Best lightweight running shoes for daily training

Saucony Kinvara 15
N/A
Not enough reviews yet

What makes it the best?

The Saucony Kinvara 15 emerged as our best daily trainer among lightweight running shoes because it kept the ride as natural and weightless as possible. Our lab confirms its effortless commitment to minimalism through its low configuration, light and loose build, and breezy upper.

Our scales confirmed its feathery build yet it’s our feet that enjoyed it the most. At only 6.8 oz (194g), we felt like flying through the miles. Moving required minimal effort and our bend test confirms Kinvara 15 is 53.3% more flexible than average!

Kinvara 15’s low profile naturally enhances stability. Our caliper reveals a 27.9/23.5 mm cushion with a firm 23.8 HA durometer reading to avoid bottoming out. It features a low 4.4 mm drop, which is great for strengthening our legs since we have to do the work.

The shoe offers a breathable space for prolonged runs, enhancing comfort for daily wear. Our smoke test mirrored our experience with an excellent ventilation score of 5/5.

Unfortunately, the shoe’s focus on less weight and more flexibility led to limited durability, particularly in the outsole. Those who prefer a trainer for several training blocks should explore elsewhere.

Pros

  • Easy on the wallet
  • Feels great at faster paces
  • Really fun
  • Retains classic Kinvara vibes
  • Stable, low-to-the-ground ride
  • Suitable for daily wear
  • Exceptionally lightweight
  • Enhances foot strength
  • Top-notch breathability

Cons

  • Limited to short runs
  • Not ideal for heel strikers
  • Toebox durability
  • Minimal outsole rubber coverage
Full review of Saucony Kinvara 15

Best lightweight speed training shoes

What makes it the best?

Faster than its shadow, Nike’s ZoomX Streakfly is our best speed trainer in the lightweight division. This non-plated modern hyper-shoe exhales pure speed while enhancing agility and comfort through its cushioning, breathability, and flexibility. 

Streakfly unveiled its dynamic and powerhouse persona on our streets, unleashing bursts of energy in every stride. Its power lies in the plush ZoomX midsole, as confirmed by our 12.1 HA durometer reading. 

This airy shoe never burdened us, it actually melted away on foot. Our scales confirm its weightlessness at 6.0 oz (171g), the lightest we’ve ever encountered in the lab. Its lack of a carbon plate makes it easy to maneuver, as shown in how we sped through corners smoothly. Our bend test confirms it’s 55.6% more flexible than average, making it comfortable for recovery paces as well.

Even during summer training, we felt like flying with the upper’s well-ventilated nature. Heat easily escapes, effectively keeping sweat, blisters, and hotspots out of the way. Our breathability test results align with a perfect score.

However, the shoe’s lack of structure and support makes it uncomfortable to run distances beyond 10K. Best to use pairs with more stability for longer distances.

Pros

  • Screams fast and speed-ready
  • Nike’s lightest racing shoe yet
  • Stable and good at cornering
  • Incredible lockdown
  • Splendid track workhorse
  • Roomy toe box
  • Grippy outsole
  • Eye-catching design
  • Not so expensive!

Cons

  • Narrow-footed runners may experience poor lockdown
  • Insanely thin laces
  • Falls short for racing
  • Heavy runners can “bottom out”
Full review of Nike ZoomX Streakfly

Best lightweight running shoes for marathon

Nike Alphafly 3
81
Good!

What makes it the best?

Alphafly 3 goes lightning fast at any distance. Characterized by boundless energy, revolutionary stability, and a refreshing ride, our lab and run tests wholeheartedly endorse this shoe as best for marathons in the lightweight running category. Going fast and far feels effortless with this Nike pair.

This beast is on fire, effortlessly keeping up with our fastest speed. It boasts a superior combination of the rigid FlyPlate and the Air Pods, adding power to every stride. Our bend test reveals it takes a solid force of 71.7N to flex this shoe to 90 degrees, 147.2% greater than average. This stiffness shows itself through strong and consistent energy return.

While instability is often found in racers, it doesn’t hold for Alphafly 3. Despite rising to skyscraper heights, the foam strategically has dual-density layers. The bottom layer is an ultra-soft 18.1 HA for gentle landings, while the top layer is a firm 29.3 HA to enhance surefootedness. This feature comes alive at longer distances, inspiring confidence since it prevents leg fatigue.

Running a marathon is a breeze with Alphafly 3’s lightweight package and ultra-breathable upper. It scored the highest rating on our breathability test and only weighed 7.1 oz (201g).

While this shoe is light, the case isn’t the same as its price. It costs a steep $285, but honestly, we think it’s worth the investment for peak performance.

Pros

  • Remarkably lightweight despite its broad size
  • Best-in-class breathability
  • Excels in the marathon distance
  • Repositioned Air Pods offer a better ride than the v2
  • ZoomX foam delivers massive energy return
  • Aids in forward momentum, especially when legs begin to fatigue
  • Better than ever for 5K/10K racing
  • Finally smooth transitions!

Cons

  • Heel strikers might wear down the outsole quickly
  • The arch could still be a challenge for some
  • The sock-like tongue might not suit everyone
Full review of Nike Alphafly 3

Best lightweight stability running shoes

What makes it the best?

After repetitive lab tests and runs, we’re truly in awe of how Brooks Launch GTS 10 packed so much support in a light and affordable shoe. For only $110, we get the stability we need from its GuideRails technology, compared to the $141 average of its counterparts. Every stride felt remarkably agile and assured, solidifying its claim as the premier lightweight stability shoe.

Weighing in at 8.5 oz (241g), the Launch GTS 10 defies the stereotype of heavy stability shoes averaging 10.3 oz (293g) in our lab. Its maneuverable midsole offers comfort and agility, as confirmed by our bend test when it surpassed the average running shoe by 35.0%, promoting smooth toe-offs and fluid transitions.

Fully embodying the “Go-To-Stability” in its name, Brooks’ GuideRails technology takes center stage. It consists of two rigid plastic pieces to guide our foot alignment and adds stiffness to the midsole torsionally. In our manual assessment, it took mighty strength to twist the shoe, earning a high torsional rigidity rating of 4/5. To ensure a balanced ride, the 19.6 HA foam delivers comfort without compressing unevenly.

However, the steep 12.2 mm heel drop makes this trainer more suitable for heel strikers. Mid-to-forefoot strikes will find better comfort and support in other pairs.

Pros

  • Offers excellent stability with GuideRails technology
  • Priced attractively at only $110
  • Features a durable outsole
  • Incredibly lightweight!
  • Boasts a comfortable upper
  • Provides a fun and responsive ride
  • Suitable for all kind of paces
  • Offers great grip on most surfaces

Cons

  • Suffers from lack of breathability
  • Becomes too stiff in winter
Full review of Brooks Launch GTS 10

Best lightweight running shoes for long runs

What makes it the best?

With a delicate 7.8 oz (220g), the Saucony Endorphin Pro 4 is our #1 lightweight option for going the distance. It takes us fast and far with its delightful cushion and dynamic midsole that infuses tons of energy in each toe-off. It’s hard not to love this shoe, with a long lifespan as the cherry on top.

A champion in the long haul game, the Pro 4’s midsole ticks all boxes packing comfort, responsiveness, and stability in one. Our foot is supported by dual-density layers: a soft and springy 18.5 HA top layer and a balanced 22.0 HA bottom layer, providing added stability during endurance runs, especially as fatigue sets in. Sandwiched in between is a rigid S-shaped carbon plate that promotes smooth forward motions. No matter the direction, EP4 is one of the toughest shoes we’ve ever tried to bend. Our flex test reveals it’s 137.5% stiffer than average, explaining the energy rebound we feel. 

The toughness displayed by this supershoe’s outsole is unmatched. We barely saw any wear after double-digit miles. Our lab results confirm it exceeds the average: a tough 85.3 HC, 2.1 mm thick, and 33.3% less indentation than average in our Dremel test.

Its stacked 38.1 mm heel and steep 9.5 mm incline show it’s made for heel-strikers. Mid-to-forefoot strikers should find a pair that will suit their running technique.

Pros

  • Durable upper and outsole
  • Spacious upper fit
  • Enhanced midsole comfort
  • Great value at $225 for a supershoe
  • Versatile across all paces
  • Ideal for heel strikers
  • More stable than ever

Cons

  • Slightly heavier than v3
  • Less suited for forefoot strikers
  • Competitors may feel quicker
Full review of Saucony Endorphin Pro 4

Best budget lightweight running shoes

Saucony Axon 3
86
Good!

What makes it the best?

Runners searching for a lightweight and light-in-the-pocket shoe can’t go wrong with Saucony Axon 3. It stood out in our lab tests and runs as a high-performance shoe with low weight and a low price tag. At only $100, it’s $37 cheaper than the average running shoe and offers unmatched value with its premium comfort, light build, and lasting durability.

Axon 3’s airy construction results in less burdened strides, allowing us to pick up the pace. Our scales reveal it’s only 8.6 oz (244g), 8.3% lighter than the average running shoe. Adding to its weightless feel is the well-ventilated upper that scored a high 4/5 on our breathability test.

For its weight and price, we were pleasantly surprised with its generous cushioning. We can run long miles feeling supported by the tall and plush stack. Our durometer reading shows it’s 22.1% softer than average, confirming its cozy sensation.

The outsole looked pristine after repetitive test runs. Axon 3 combines a thicker and tougher-than-average rubber to ensure it can take the abuse of several training blocks. Not only that, it gripped various surfaces with exceptional consistency.

Axon 3 feels quite rigid for easy runs. Our lab tests reveal it’s stiffer than average on all sides. Runners who prefer a more natural feel should check other alternatives.

Pros

  • Incredible value at only $100
  • Significant weight reduction from version 2
  • Impressively cushioned with PWRRUN foam
  • Fantastic durability
  • Suitable for quicker paces
  • Excellent as a daily workhorse
  • Lovely upper
  • Works for short and long runs

Cons

  • Probably too stiff for very relaxed runs
  • Slightly narrower forefoot than before
Full review of Saucony Axon 3

How light are lightweight running shoes?

Racing shoes that weigh less than 200g or 7 oz are considered lightweight. Daily trainers that weigh less than 250g or 8.8 oz are considered lightweight. 

lightweight-running-shoes-on-a-scale.jpg

In our lab, we always test shoes in men’s size 9. If you use the “lightweight” filter on our running shoe page, it will show all running shoes that weigh less than 250g. 

Why are lightweight running shoes GREAT?

A few reasons: 

  1. The lighter the shoe, the faster the run (as we’ve covered in great detail here). It helps that you do not feel like the shoe is weighing you down. 

  2. If the shoe is high-stacked and lightweight, it most likely features great new technology that makes it cushioned yet lightweight. This especially applies to carbon-plated racers because they are very high-stacked and light at the same time. But, for the carbon plate to work well, it has to work together with a premium foam (and not standard). 

We talked about shoe weight in great detail in this guide

How do brands make shoes weigh less?

To make the shoe lightweight, it’s not enough to just cut back on the material. Brands have their own ways and they usually do a few different things at the same time. 

  1. Cutting down on the padding. When this happens, we usually see a very thin tongue and a very thin heel, sometimes even sock-like 
  2. Cutting down on the outsole rubber. Then, we see a lot of exposed midsole which is lighter than the rubber 
  3. Making the cuts in the foam itself is done so that the shoe gets lighter and it helps with flexibility 
  4. Using new technologies and here we specifically talk about premium midsole foams and carbon plates which, as a group, can make the shoe high-stacked and lightweight 

Less padding in lightweight running shoes

To make the shoes lightweight, brands have to cut corners. Sometimes, it can be as small as ditching the heel tab, while other times it can be as big as removing the tongue or heel padding. 

measuring-tongue-padding-lightweight-running-shoes.jpg
Using a digital caliper to measure the thickness of the tongue 

Lightweight running shoes have 2x less tongue padding than non-lightweight running shoes on average.

  • Average tongue thickness in non-lightweight running shoes: 6.6mm
  • Average tongue thickness in lightweight running shoes: 3.3 mm
different-tongue-thickness-in-running-shoes.jpg
Very thin tongue (left) vs. a very padded tongue (right)

We can also look at the differences in heel padding.

difference-in-heel-padding-thickness-lightweight-running-shoes.jpg
Sock-like heel (left) vs. a very padded heel collar and a plastic heel counter (right)

Many cozy running shoes have a lot of padding at the back, while lightweight running shoes tend to omit that. 

Rubber coverage in lightweight running shoes

Rubber is heavy and it’s certainly heavier than the foam. But, good rubber coverage is imperative for shoes that should work for overpronators, for flat feet, for wet terrain, and that should be stable. 

forefoot-rubber-placement-lightweight-running-shoes.jpg
Lightweight race shoes can have rubber only at the front (indicating they are best used by the forefoot and mid strikers)

In our shoe lab, we measure the thickness of the outsole rubber. 

thickness-of-the-outsole-rubber-lightweight-running-shoes.jpg
Using a digital caliper to measure the thickness of the outsole rubber in lightweight running shoes
  • Average outsole rubber thickness in lightweight running shoes: 2.5 mm.
  • Average outsole rubber thickness in non-lightweight running shoes: 3.5 mm.

Exposed midsole in lightweight running shoes

Exposed midsole is the term used to describe an outsole where the rubber does not cover the whole surface but, instead, the midsole is clearly visible. The exposed midsole can be in touch with the ground or it can just be visible but not in touch with the ground. 

exposed-midsole-ground-contact-lightweight-running-shoes.jpg
Exposed midsole (in white) is clearly visible but it mostly stays in contact with the ground
midsole-cutouts-ligthweight-running-shoes.jpg
The midsole is exposed but also cut out, and in those places, there's no ground contact 

Running in shoes that have a lot of exposed midsole instead of rubber is risky in wet weather because rubber is the material that grips, not the midsole. Also, landing on the exposed midsole instead of the rubber means less durability, as the midsole is easier to destroy than the rubber. 

Durability of lightweight running shoes

Here, we must differentiate between speed+race shoes and daily trainers because race shoes are often less durable, while daily trainers are meant for big mileages. 

In the lab, we test the durability of the toebox, heel padding and the outsole. We use a Dremel to test all 3 of those. We press it against the surface and then assess or measure the damage done. 

Testing the durability of the toebox in RunRepeat lab

When we look at the damage done on the toebox, we assess it on a 1-5 scale, where 1 is the least durable. 

toebox-damage-lightweight-running-shoes.jpg
Different levels of damage done to the toebox (on the left 1/5 for the worst durability; on the right 5/5 for the best durability)

 

Using a Dremel to test the durability of the heel padding in running shoes

Here, we also look at the damage and assign it a 1-5 rating, where 5 is the most durable. 

heel-padding-durability-tests-damage-levels.jpg
Different levels of heel padding damage as a result of a durability test (not durable vs. durable)

Testing the durability of the outsole in RunRepeat shoe lab

outsole-durability-lightweight-running-shoes.jpg
Durable vs. a non-durable outsole (although the non-durable one has exposed midsole, not rubber)

Here, we use a tire tread gauge to measure the depth of the dent precisely. The deeper the dent, the less durable the outsole 

In the tables below, we bolded the better results because they might not be as intuitive if listed like this. For the toebox and heel padding durability, larger numbers indicate better durability. In the case of outsole durability, the smaller number (shallower dents) indicates better durability. 

 

Non-lightweight race shoes

Lightweight race shoes

Avg toebox durability

2.3

1.9

Avg heel padding durability

4.0

4.4

Avg outsole durability

1.1

1.3

 

 

Non-lightweight daily trainers

Lightweight daily trainers

Avg toebox durability

2.7

2.7

Avg heel padding durability

3.2

2.7

Avg outsole durability

0.9

1.1

Carbon-plated lightweight running shoes 

33% of lightweight running shoes in our database are carbon-plated

carbon-plate-lightweight-running-shoes.jpg
How a carbon plate that we took out of a shoe looks like

What makes these running shoes special is the fact that they are high-stacked, yet lightweight AND insanely responsive (if equipped with a premium foam). 

Clearly visible black carbon-fiber plate embedded in the midsole 

If you’re interested in running shoes with a carbon-fiber plate, we wholeheartedly recommend our very geeky guide Carbon-Plated Shoes Cut In Half, Explained and Lab-Tested.  

3 downsides of lightweight running shoes

  1. There aren’t many stability running shoes (for overpronation/flat feet) that are lightweight. Stability features weigh more so it’s usually impossible to achieve the light weight with them. Currently, only 3% of lightweight running shoes in our database are stability shoes.
  2. There aren’t many lightweight trail running shoes because trail shoes need to be more rugged and durable. Often, they have a toe bumper or enforced upper at the front, deep lugs, and other features that only add to the overall weight. In our database, out of all lightweight running shoes, only 3% are for the trails.
  3. Because a lot of weight had to be saved along the way, some durability had to be sacrificed. Often, it’s in the outsole, where we see less rubber and more exposed midsole, and an exposed midsole is less durable and has a horrible grip. And sometimes, it’s about comfort: brands skimped on padding in the tongue or heel so there’s a lace bite or a very stiff heel that irritates the back of the foot. 
  4. They cost more

Price of lightweight running shoes

On average, lightweight running shoes are 14.4% more expensive than the non-lightweight running shoes. The average price of lightweight running shoes is $161.7, while the average price for non-lightweight running shoes is $138.4. 

Author
Jovana Subic
Jovana Subic
Whether it's a vertical kilometre or an ultra, climbing in the Alps or exploring local mountains, Jovana uses every opportunity to trade walls and concrete for forests and trails. She logs at least 10h/week on trails, with no off-season, and 4x more on research on running and running shoes. With a background in physics and engineering management, she prefers her running spiced with data.